๐จโ๐จ Art Class in the Future
Hello class, today we are learning how to sketch. Our model for today is Yasha, the champion of our school in contortion and our most posable model! Now let's all politely ask him to take one of his best poses!
But Mrs. Brush, this pose looks so complicated, can he even hold it for 40 minutes so we have enough time to sketch it?
Don't worry Jimmy, it won't be that long. 4 seconds, more likely! Now grab your phones and take a good picture. Nice! Now we're going to do some quick simple sketches...
Oh I know! We'll have to sketch while looking at our phones! It's so smart and modern, Mrs. Brush! So he will not need to hold such a difficult pose for so long, and drawing from the phone is much easier!
That's right, Stevie, now put down your pencil and grab your precious iPhone. Open your photo editor, go to Filters, then Sketch...
Good, very good. So close to the original! Look, at this rate you will become a great artist very quickly! Now you can run and show your work to your parents if they are still not convinced that art school was a great investment for their money! ๐
What do you think? ๐
Fantastico... me encanta como esta de puntillas con los pies para no perder el equilibrio y la pose de tranquilidad que tiene mientras sus piernas hacen el esfuerzo.
____
Fantastic... I love how she is standing on tiptoes with her feet so as not to lose her balance and the calm pose she has while her legs make the effort.
____
Fantastic... I love how she is standing on tiptoes with her feet so as not to lose her balance and the calm pose she has while her legs make the effort.
Me alegro mucho de que lo hayas disfrutado!! Todo en un dรญa de trabajo para el Sr. Goma-Goma! ๐
____
So glad you enjoyed!! All in a day's work for Mr. Gum-Gum!
____
So glad you enjoyed!! All in a day's work for Mr. Gum-Gum!
Im get up now hoping a new photo,please do a yash deeply back bend photo with black cat suit. For phone wallpaper
I'm on it ๐คฃ
The style transfer algorithms are a quirky gimmick but surely everyone will agree the original render far exceeds the sketch version. It's simply beautiful!
Very glad you liked the picture! Though I'm puzzled why you compare the sketch and the picture in terms of quality... it was a simple Photoshop filter as a bonus just to illustrate the story :P
Thank you Yuni, Iโm just about to learn to draw.๐
Ouch! I was just trying to make fun of the ongoing drama ๐
I'm a little surprised that, when offered the opportunity to pose for an art class, that Yasha managed to keep their clothes on.
Another extraordinary fold. Very well done.
Another extraordinary fold. Very well done.
That's such a good point... I think maybe because I originally wanted to focus on some championship where he got that medal but somehow he turned into an art class model in the end? ๐ค
Sorry, I actually just don't have the right brain to set goals and actually reach them, I pretty much always tend to start something and then deviate and get into a completely different direction than planned ๐
Oh and I'm happy you liked the fold! In the end, a good fold is all that matters, plus I think some clothes actually make his legs look nicer ^^
Sorry, I actually just don't have the right brain to set goals and actually reach them, I pretty much always tend to start something and then deviate and get into a completely different direction than planned ๐
Oh and I'm happy you liked the fold! In the end, a good fold is all that matters, plus I think some clothes actually make his legs look nicer ^^
You've made this look so easy to Yasha. He's got this expression like "OK, I'm ready. When is the stretching going to start?"
Mwahaha, but remembering Snails & Holidays, this must be indeed a halfway point for him ๐
Regarding all this "AI will replace artists" drama...
I think it's just next step, not somehing truly new. When photography was invented, when digital editing was invented, when 3d rendering was invented, every time traditional artists complained that it will replace them all. However each time it didn't - because you still need an artist to understand what to draw and how it should look. New instruments helped, but not replaced real author - maybe you will not need to learn how to use canvas, pencil, paint and brush, but you still must learn to get picture composition and to understand what you are depicting and what emotions you want to show.
I think it's just next step, not somehing truly new. When photography was invented, when digital editing was invented, when 3d rendering was invented, every time traditional artists complained that it will replace them all. However each time it didn't - because you still need an artist to understand what to draw and how it should look. New instruments helped, but not replaced real author - maybe you will not need to learn how to use canvas, pencil, paint and brush, but you still must learn to get picture composition and to understand what you are depicting and what emotions you want to show.
I think the main part of the drama is not what wonderful things AI can do but WHY it can do that. It can only paint its own pictures so well because it's using big chunks of already existing pictures that may be copyrighted and nobody gave those guys any permission to scan them. You can put an existing artist's name and get pictures that very closely resemble their existing artworks, like trees in the background or parts of the body and poses are just copied 1:1.
AI artists use that to put together their own images that are nothing but collages of already existing artworks that were scanned without permission, and that's the main drama here. AI is good at collaging pieces that blend well together but it's really bad at *generating* anything that doesn't exist in its database, so technically it's not generating anything at all, merely blending and collaging chunks of image data.
Noobs who run the AI click on things and think the AI *generates* a whole new pic for them that never existed before, but they're clueless of the fact (and the developers don't tell them) that the pic is made from parts of already existing pictures, sometimes two or more pictures are blended together to conceal their source. In essence, AI art is nothing but Frankenstein's monster put together from parts and organs from a hundred different corpses and then reanimated ๐
Of course, you can be a skilled artist and make those collages with AI more professionally, you will even have a feeling that you're adding your own ideas, some emotions, a composition of your choice, but it's just putting together a "new" ideal human being from parts of dead bodies carefully selected from the morgue... When a true human being is born, they grow from a single cell, that we can call a true process of generation, but blending together existing pieces of already adult humans is nothing but a monster... ๐ช
AI artists use that to put together their own images that are nothing but collages of already existing artworks that were scanned without permission, and that's the main drama here. AI is good at collaging pieces that blend well together but it's really bad at *generating* anything that doesn't exist in its database, so technically it's not generating anything at all, merely blending and collaging chunks of image data.
Noobs who run the AI click on things and think the AI *generates* a whole new pic for them that never existed before, but they're clueless of the fact (and the developers don't tell them) that the pic is made from parts of already existing pictures, sometimes two or more pictures are blended together to conceal their source. In essence, AI art is nothing but Frankenstein's monster put together from parts and organs from a hundred different corpses and then reanimated ๐
Of course, you can be a skilled artist and make those collages with AI more professionally, you will even have a feeling that you're adding your own ideas, some emotions, a composition of your choice, but it's just putting together a "new" ideal human being from parts of dead bodies carefully selected from the morgue... When a true human being is born, they grow from a single cell, that we can call a true process of generation, but blending together existing pieces of already adult humans is nothing but a monster... ๐ช
My God, that face! The balance between art and reality is pefect.
Thanks ^^
Deliciously sexy legs and feet ๐
So glad you enjoyed! ๐
A big thank-you not only for moar fan-fave Yasha but also one of the most succint and understandable explanations of the AI "art" process. I've had a devil of a time trying to explain it as simply. From now on, I'll just link this page. In this case, it's an added bonus the art is SFW. Normally, it'd be just my luck there's -perfect- explanation in the comments but it's next to Wolfy sending Helmut "Over The Edge" or an "Elven Captive". :D
Is it any better next to a bendy femboy XD
I'm glad you liked my countryside explanation of AI, but I have to admit I don't know how it actually works and I think only mathematicians know for sure ๐
I talked more about it using existing images and how people enter a prompt and go "wow I created a picture of a native chief with a painted face!" They think it's generated, but just try adding Emma Watson to the prompt and you'll end up with images that are pretty much stylized/modified copies of her popular photos... This means the native chief was also a modified copy of some existing photo, you just don't know the source, and this creates a false impression that you created it. It's like going to Google Images, looking for something and thinking that you're creating all the pictures just because you've never seen them before, and they were "born" only after you entered the text in the search bar :D
The more you work with the AI, the more you see that it's just a bunch of photos it's trying to stitch together. All the people, furniture, plants, mountains, decorations, etc are based on existing images, which is clear when it makes a forest with 5 trees, and all these 5 trees look like clones. So it didn't learn how to draw a tree, only scanned it to inject its copies wherever it fits... :P
I'm glad you liked my countryside explanation of AI, but I have to admit I don't know how it actually works and I think only mathematicians know for sure ๐
I talked more about it using existing images and how people enter a prompt and go "wow I created a picture of a native chief with a painted face!" They think it's generated, but just try adding Emma Watson to the prompt and you'll end up with images that are pretty much stylized/modified copies of her popular photos... This means the native chief was also a modified copy of some existing photo, you just don't know the source, and this creates a false impression that you created it. It's like going to Google Images, looking for something and thinking that you're creating all the pictures just because you've never seen them before, and they were "born" only after you entered the text in the search bar :D
The more you work with the AI, the more you see that it's just a bunch of photos it's trying to stitch together. All the people, furniture, plants, mountains, decorations, etc are based on existing images, which is clear when it makes a forest with 5 trees, and all these 5 trees look like clones. So it didn't learn how to draw a tree, only scanned it to inject its copies wherever it fits... :P
It's the serene look on his face, contrasted with his legs stretched clear to his tiptoes, that makes this awesome. Also, that cute little package.
-tbj
-tbj
Thank you so much! Gotta love that combination as well ^^ Heard somewhere that the greatest level of mastery for a circus contortionist is when they learn to stretch their lips into a smile while stretching the body, so to speak. Meaning once you can do complex things like it's nothing, that's the top level...
ะฃัั, ั ะฑั ั
ะพัะตะป ััะพััั ัะทะฐะดะธ ะฝะตะณะพ ััะพ-ะฑั ัะฒะธะดะตัั ะดััะณัั ัะพัะบั ะทัะตะฝะธั ^^
____
Phew, I wish I could stand behind him to see a different point of view ^^
____
Phew, I wish I could stand behind him to see a different point of view ^^
๐
DISCLAIMER: ALL WORKS ON THIS SITE ARE PURELY FICTIONAL AND TAKE GREAT LIBERTIES WITH THE HUMAN FORM, EXAGGERATING AND DISTORTING IT TO MAKE FOR A STRIKING VISUAL. THESE DEPICTIONS ARE NOT ANATOMICALLY ACCURATE AND SHOULD ONLY BE SEEN AS A FANTASY, NOT AS AN INSPIRATION FOR ANY REAL-LIFE ACTIVITIES.